For Jyoti Singh…Lest
we forget...
One of the
unsurprising mandatory courses offered at hopefully all law schools is
Professional Ethics. Members of the public would be greatly pleased that in
fact lawyers and advocates in training are indeed taught how to be courteous,
how to keep clients reasonably informed as well as how to charge reasonable
fees, manage separate client accounts as well as how to maintain other positive
duties to clients such as good faith, confidentiality and competence among
others.
Professional ethics also
requires that an advocate cannot refuse a brief, provided that the client is
willing to pay fees, and that the advocate is not otherwise engaged. There are
obviously some exceptions to this general rule but it is indeed a bit troubling to think that I may be ethically and
professionally required to represent suspected terrorists, rapists or mass
murderers as a right minded lawyer and that my personal beliefs, feelings or
dispositions would be largely irrelevant!
This dread was
further heightened last Friday during a professional ethics class when the course
instructor required us to watch ‘India’s Daughter’,
a 52 Minute BBC Production on the infamous Delhi gang rape that occurred in
2012. For the purpose of our class, it was material to listen, observe, learn
and critic both the prosecution and defence lawyers stances. So gruesome were
the facts and circumstances of this case that the Indian Bar Association had previously
passed a resolution that no one should defend the accused rapists and minor in
the matter contrary to the cab-rank rule that most commonwealth jurisdictions currently
uphold.
Despite the legalese
and rationale of watching this documentary in this particular class setting, I
couldn’t help but notice how a given socialization process impacts how a
particular group of people reason and
analyze situations both directly and indirectly. For instance, some of the
comments given by both counsels in relation to the matter seemed to suggest that
the victim was partly or entirely to blame for the heinous crime that ultimately
resulted in her death!
Having never been to
India before, it was glaringly evident from the contributors of the documentary
that India has a very rich culture and history to which part, most of its
inhabitants are proud of, but it is also chiefly repressive and discriminative towards
girls and women who are considered second-class citizen. Most disturbing were
averments made by the convicts; that a decent Indian girl should not be out
alone without the company of a male relative or out alone at 8:00 p.m. entirely
or even worse that she should not fight when being violated in the manner that
she was!
It was bitter sweet to see the huge outcry and
multiple public protests that resulted from this incident. Indians of all ages,
creed and gender took to the street demanding for women’s rights and the need
to be afforded better protection. Most importantly they were also fighting for that
Jyoti Singh gets the justice she deserves. It was indeed humbling and unifying
to watch and it reaffirms the notion that history and hopefully socialization
processes can be changed during such trying times.
Even if the law
affirms that every person however wicked, depraved, vile, degenerate,
perverted, loathsome, vicious or repulsive has a right to be defended
in a court of law, every victim including Indian young lasses also have rights,
duties and freedoms that must be respected and upheld in life and in death!
No comments:
Post a Comment